All of us are trying to get our heads around the overall picture of the
race for the White House and how Sarah Palin fits in. If we listen
carefully, we notice some consistencies and some inconsistencies that
are very telling.
Starting around Sept 1st, Gov. Palin began
focusing on "crony capitalism". Now, she may have used the words before
that, but not as a central theme of her speeches. At the same time the
phrase, "I'm not for sale" began to be used. Since Sept. 1st, she has
been consistent in her use of these themes. Around the same time, the
Solyndra fiasco being only the tip of the iceberg also became a part of
her speeches.
What is inconsistent is the October 5th decision.
Why should she be railing against crony capitalism if it means taking
down people on her own team who are trying to defeat Obama? Why would
anyone care if she can't be bought if she's not running for anything?
Sept.
1st was a turning point in the Palin campaign. It was the point where a
strategy was developed on how to proceed and what her campaign was
going to be about and how it would be differentiated from the other
candidates.
Now we learn that her adviser, Peter Schweizer has a
book coming out on Nov. 15th called "Throw Them All Out: How
politicians and their friends get rich off insider stock tips, land
deals,
and cronyism that would send the rest of us to prison." We also know
that Jack Abramoff's book, "Capitol Punishment: The Hard Truth About
Washington Corruption from America’s Most Notorious Lobbyist", is coming
out next week and will get "60 Minutes" coverage. There is every
reason to believe that Peter would have shared his work with Gov.
Palin. Although she would probably not have dealings with Abramoff,
pre-pubs of his book have been released to media and it would be
reasonable that she would have been able to get access to it.
Steve
Bannon and Andrew Breitbart have also indicated that they are working
on projects more controversial than "The Undefeated" that will break
about a month before the Iowa caucus. It is believed these involve
corruption in government.
We know that if any of the
allegations in the various books and videos involve any of the
Republican candidates, the media will tear them apart. Gov. Palin
likely knows who the allegations will involve. She may be the cleanest
politician in history. She has never had to get involved in the party
machinery to get elected. She has always run against the machine. She
may be the only governor ever elected, with the possible exception of
Jesse Ventura, who didn't have to get their hands dirty raising money or
dealing with party bosses.
So how do we explain the October
5th decision? When the revelations come out in November, all candidates
will be examined thoroughly. By coming in from the outside, Gov. Palin
becomes an honest solution and you can bet she will have a plan to
clean up D.C. She misses very little by losing out on NH, SC, and FL.
There will be plenty of delegates remaining to win the nomination. So,
was her decision solely strategic? Probably not. Her family probably
did have some reservations and certainly finances would have been
considered. An honest politician running a campaign against corruption
and depending on voter contributions won't have to worry about receiving
them.
The next couple of weeks will tell the story. The
Herman Cain story will have played out. The corruption books will
impact and Gov. Palin will be sitting in the catbird seat.
Palin is dangerous, under-educated, celebrity-driven hag.
ReplyDelete